MINI-RESEARCH
PAPER
EXPLORING
TEACHERS’ PERSPECTIVES ABOUT SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT IN A PRIVATE COMMUNITY BASED
SECONDARY SCHOOL IN KARACHI, PAKISTAN
BY: BASHIR AHMED KHAN (PDT)
Introduction
School
improvement is not a single event rather it is a continuous process. Different
change initiatives are seen more effective in the school improvement process.
From reading literatures, classroom discourses and my own experiences, I came to
know that it is one of the effective and systematic processes to bring positive
change in the schools. Similarly, Van et al. (1985) as cited in Mortimore (1998)
defines, school improvement is a systematic sustained effort aimed at a change
in learning conditions and other related internal conditions with ultimate aim
of accomplishing goals more effectively. Hence, school improvement is considered
a process through which different aspects of school improved through various
activities and strategies. Likewise, Hopkins and Harris (2000) stated, “school
improvement is a process that focuses on enhancing the quality of students
learning”. Literature on school improvement gives high importance to the role
teachers’ play in improving their schools. However, there is a dearth of such
literature that teachers play their role in school improvement process in the
context of developing countries.
This
paper gives a background and purpose of the study, school context and research
questions. It also discusses about the methodology used, sampling
procedure,research findings, discussion and conclusion of the
study.
It
has been observed and experienced that the school improvement process is
considered the job of school leaders or any external agents. While school
teachers, parents, community and students are observed as passive participants
in the process of school improvement. However, literature emphasized that the
school improvement is a joint venture of all the stakeholders of an
organization. Similarly, a lot of literature indentifies teachers as important
stakeholder in school improvement process. Hence, this study explores the
perspectives of teachers about their roles in school improvement and the
facilitating factors of a successful school.
School context
The
school in which I conducted my study is a private community secondary school in
Karachi. The school was established in early nineties and it was run by a faith
based community. Presently, there are 42 staffs under the supervision of a
principal. The school has a reputation for academic excellence. The principal
and teachers are embarked on several school improvement initiatives, aimed at
improving students’ academic and non-academic potentials. As a result, in
comparison to other private schools, it emerged as better performing school in
national exams.
How
do teachers in a private community secondary school in Karachi, perceive their
role in school improvement?
·
What
are the teachers’ perceptions about their role in school improvement
process?
·
What
are the teachers’ perceptions about facilitating factors of a successful
school?
The
qualitative case study method is chosen as one of the most suitable research
approaches to explore the phenomena. Purposeful sampling is opted to select the
research participants for the study. I selected two teachers as my research
participants. I used semi-structured interview (see Appendix A) as main method
of data collection. Informal conversation, audio tape and field notes were also
used as tools for data collection. Consent form (see Appendix B) is duly signed
by the participant and assured that the data would be used only for report
purpose.
The
data is transcribed and findings of the study are categorized into different
themes.
Teachers
perceive their role as facilitating students to learn more. However, they are of
the view that in order to do this effectively, they need to be competent
teachers. He/She said, “our students are more able than us; we should develop
ourselves according to their needs; otherwise we cannot satisfy their
educational needs”. Similarly, Bhatia,
Damral & Damral (2005)
suggest that a teacher should be that of a facilitator, a resource person or a
person who organizes a variety of learning opportunities to fulfill the needs of
the students.
Teachers
perceive that teaching and learning is more effective process for school
improvement. The foremost role of a teacher is to properly plan for teaching and
learning. He/she shared that for effective teaching and learning planning is
very important because a plan guides a teacher what to teach and how to teach.
Teachers perceive that proper planning of a lesson also improves students
learning outcomes which are the basic purpose of school improvement. Rehmani
(2000)
pointed
out that planning for a lesson enhances teachers learning as a result it has a
greater impact on students learning and development.
The
study reveals that teachers give prime importance to the development of positive
relationship with students, because good relationship is important for
successful school. The teacher asserted that “the students have become more
naughty due to media. So it is relationship which blind students and teachers
together. Fullan and Hargreaves (1998) also emphasize that a strong relationship
between teachers and students is beneficial for both of them in terms of mutual
understanding and trust building.
Facilitating Factors of Successful Schools
Professional development
The
teachers are of the view that until or unless the teachers are professionally
trained school cannot be transformed into a successful school. For professional
development, school should create a culture of generating and sharing knowledge.
She/he shared that some of the teachers have attended trainings at AKU-IED[1], as a result they
engage in activity-based teaching. He/she claimed that, “such training
opportunities attract teachers towards the school and it is also useful to
sustain the existing school teachers”.
Teachers
perceive that in order to work effectively school should have enough teachers,
who may help them to undertake school improvement initiatives. The teachers are
also view that physical resources are also pivotal in facilitating teachers to
work smoothly. It was evident from interview that financial resources are vital
in enabling various activities to be carried out in the school. Adelman and
Taylor (2007) state that “if enough resources cannot be devoted to essential
change processes, substantive school improvement will not be achieved” (p.
60).
Teachers
view that their empowerment gives them an opportunity to do their work in a
smooth manner, because through empowerment, they can exercise their expertise
and skills. However, he/she suggested that school leadership should be
participatory in order to facilitate teachers to play their role effectively.
Stoll and Mortimore (1995) suggest that school improvement needs a participatory
leadership approach, where all teachers work together, and the head teacher
plays the role of a guide and facilitator.
The
study reveals that the teachers’ perception about their role is integrated with
many activities which have been set-up for the purpose of school improvement.
For instance, teachers view that proper planning is important for effective
teaching and learning. Sun, Creemers and Jong (2007) also pointed out that
effective teaching and learning is one of the important processes of school
improvement. Similarly, Fullan and Hargreaves (1998)
maintain that teachers are responsible for taking initiatives for school
improvement by being active in planning, organizing school-based activities,
providing feedback and helping students understand and accomplish the given
task. Furthermore, teachers perceive that their role in improving students’
learning can be through encouraging them to participate in various curricular
and co-curricular activities. The aim is to develop students’ communication
skills because according to teachers, it is important for their practical lives.
Moreover, the study reveals that teachers strive to develop a positive
relationship between teachers and students in order to develop students’
confidence. I agree that relationship paves the way towards success. Similarly,
Barry and King (1999) stated that teachers, either inside the classroom or
outside the classroom, exert a great deal of influence on establishing a good
quality of teacher-student relationship. However, the findings also show that
the activities undertaken by the school rarely bring a positive change because
the school is overridden with many challenges such as lack of teachers’
recognition, workload and time constraints.
The
study also reveals that different facilitating factors support a school to
transform into a successful school. For instance, the teacher perceives that
professional development of teachers is important for successful schools.
Hopkins, Ainscow and West (1994) also argue that teachers’ learning has a direct
effect on students learning. They, therefore, consider teachers are the core of
school improvement.The teacher perceives that different in-house and outside
trainings are essential for professional development of teachers and sustain
teachers. Cheng (2000) also argues that teachers should take teaching as a
lifelong learning involving themselves in continuous professional development
programs. I also experienced that social context enable teachers to learn from
each other, support each other (Sergiovanni, 1998). Likewise, Hussain (2007)
claims that professional development opportunities work as a vehicle for
teachers’ development which has a positive effect on school improvement
initiatives. However, findings show that due to lack of appropriate skills and
knowledge, teachers are likely to be confused about the change process. As a
result their envisaged activities, which aim at improving the school is
overtaken by internal and external problems; such as lack of resources, heavy
workload and time constraints.
Conclusion
The
study reveals that school improvement is a joint venture of all stakeholders and
the teachers are key players in change process. The teachers perceive their role
is important in initiating different activities and strategies for school
improvement. However, different internal and external factors hinder them to
take initiatives in change process. If appropriate resources are allocated,
collaborative culture is developed and participatory leadership approach is
used, school can be improved. The teachers also perceive that various
facilitating factors motivate/influence teachers to transform their school into
a successful school.
References:
Adelman,
H. S., & Taylor, L. (2007). Systematic change for school improvement. Journal of educational and
psychological consultation.17(1), 55-77
Barry,
K., & King, L. (1999).Beginning Teaching and Beyond (3rd Edition).
NSW:
Social Science Press
Bhatia,
K. K., Damral, B. D., &Damral, P. (2005).Advanced psychology of teaching and learning
process.New Delhi : Kalyani
Publishers.
Cheng,
Y. C. (2000). Globalization,
Localization, and individualization for effective education.Unpublished
paper presented at international council for school effectiveness and
improvement. Hong Kong Institute for Education.
Fullan,
M., & Hargreaves, A. (1998).What’s
worth fighting for in your school? Buckingham: Open University
Press.
Hillman,
J., & Stoll, L. (1994).Understanding school improvement.Improvement Network Research Matters. 1,
pp. 1-4
Hopkins,
D., Ainscow, M., & West, M. (1994).School improvement in an era of change.
London: Chassel.
Hopkins,
D., & Harris, D. (2000). Introduction to special feature: Alternative
perspective on school improvement. School
leadership and management. 20(1), 9-14
Hussain,
M. (2007).Teachers as agents of school
improvement: a case study. Unpublished masters’ thesis, Aga Khan University
Karachi Pakistan.
Mortimore,
P. (1998). The road to improvement:
Reflections on school effectiveness.Lisse, Netherlands:
Swets&Zeitlinger.
Rehmani,
A. A. M. (2000). Linking teachers’
professional development to school improvement: a case study of Visiting
Teachers Program of the Aga Khan University Institute for Educational
Development.Unpublished doctorial dissertation, University of London,
London.
Sergiovanni,
T. (1998).Leadership as pedagogy, capital development and school
effectiveness.International Journal of
Leadership in Education: Theory and practice. 1(1), 37-46
Stoll,
L., & Mortimore, P. (1995). School
effectiveness and school improvement. View point, 2(1), 1-8
Sun,
H., Creemers, B. P., & Jong, R. D. (2007).Contextual factors and effective
school improvement. School effectiveness
and school improvement. 18(1), 93-122
No comments:
Post a Comment